The number one problem with the new draft guidance is that an informal enquiry potentially becomes a detailed “assessment of suitability”. This means many more families will be under active investigation at any given time. Meanwhile the government says it wants to promote positive relations between home educating families and the local authority. The consultation asked for views on this, as well as asking whether the new system would be proportionate.
The new guidance is not ready to be used. It is still at the draft stage. The consultation closed 18.1.24. The current guidance remains in force until such time as a final new version is published. The current guidance can be found here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/elective-home-education The law has not changed and there is no new funding (or indeed any funding) for local authorities dealing with elective home education.
Where a child is not registered at a school, the local authority has a duty to take formal action if it appears that the child is not receiving education otherwise than at school. This has come to be understood as requiring the authority in the first instance to make informal enquiries about the child’s education. The title of Chapter 6 is “How local authorities decide whether a child appears to be receiving suitable EHE” and covers informal enquiries.
The process for taking formal action is set out in a sequence of steps starting at section 437 of the Education Act 1996 as I explain on my page about School Attendance Orders https://edyourself.org/school-attendance-orders/ There is no equivalent detail in primary legislation for the informal enquiries process; it has just evolved over time. In 2006 the government added section 436A immediately before s 437 which is headed Duty to make arrangements to identify children not receiving education. I explain more in my page on Children Missing Education
After reading the new draft, local authorities might wrongly believe that an informal enquiry should be a lengthy task where families should be chased for a great deal of personal information to enable the LA to complete its “assessment of suitability”. It would make LAs over-cautious since box-ticking would become the priority and the LA would have to keep coming back for more evidence before it could sign off “suitable education.”